久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Montana's TikTok ban violates people's constitutional rights

By Harvey Dzodin | China Daily | Updated: 2023-06-01 07:41
Share
Share - WeChat
A smartphone with a displayed TikTok logo is placed on a computer motherboard in this illustration taken February 23, 2023. [Photo/Agencies]

Out to seek publicity like any other US politician, Montana Governor Greg Gianforte just got his second dose of national and international exposure by approving a state-wide ban on popular social media app TikTok. He earned his first "15 minutes of fame" six years ago for assaulting a journalist whose question he did not like. Gianforte pleaded guilty and part of his sentence was to take anger management classes. The classes obviously did not work because the piece of legislation he signed is an assault on the US Constitution, about 200,000 TikTok creators and 6,000 businesses in Montana, as well as in China.

The Senate Bill SB0419 begins with the false premise that China "is an adversary of the United States and Montana and has an interest in gathering information about Montanans, Montana companies, and the intellectual property of users to engage in corporate and international espionage". In the absence of proof, the law is based on paranoia and false national security concerns. The law also violates American users' right to access and choose social media platforms.

In separate lawsuits, TikTok and several of its creators have sued the state of Montana. There are many reasons for me, as a lawyer, to believe the lawsuits will succeed and the ban will be overturned. As one expert said, "Montana's TikTok ban is laughably unconstitutional, but it's also comically difficult to enforce." The law, however, is not a laughing matter, although it is unconstitutional.

First, the law is a clear violation of the First Amendment right of TikTok and its users to free speech. TikTok has the constitutional right to editorially decide whether, and how, to host, distribute and promote creator-made speech.

According to a 2022 study by Pew Research Center, about a quarter of US citizens below 30 regularly get their news from TikTok, while news consumption has declined or has not increased on many other social media sites including Facebook. Also, "political speech", a staple of news websites, is the most protected form of free speech under the Bill of Rights.

Second, SB0419 is premised on the false assumption that espionage is involved.

Third, the US Constitution's commerce clause limits the power of states to unduly burden interstate and foreign commerce. By banning TikTok in Montana, the law interferes with TikTok's operation and accessibility in other states, not least because technological limitations may result in the site being banned or curtailed in other states as app stores don't have the ability to geo-fence on a state-by-state basis.

And fourth, the Constitution prohibits "bills of attainder", which are laws, such as SB0419, that single out persons or entities, and impose penalties on them without a trial.

The SB0419 is also a laughably bad policy.

The Montana administration claims it is protecting the privacy of the people in the state. But TikTok collects less identifiable data than other social media sites, and unlike some of them, it does not collect precise location data or even require a real name. If another country, or anyone else, wants user data, they are readily available, for a price, from data brokers who have harvested user information, including mobile phone locations, from social media sites. So if the US state really wanted to protect people's privacy, it would have banned all social media sites or enacted broad privacy protection regulations like the European Union General Data Protection Regulation.

The US always complains about China. But through its actions, it has always made it clear that "rules are for thee, and not for me". In addition, one overwhelming advantage the US has is jurisdiction over the small number of big companies that, in essence, run the modern internet.

More important, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act gives the US the power to compel these companies to allow access for the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency to intercept social media conversations of users both foreign and, through the use of so-called "backdoor searches", US citizens. In 2021, the most recent year for which data are available, the US targeted 232,432"non-US persons". The number doesn't include US citizens.

Some other US states, as well as the federal government, are waiting to see what happens to Montana's law before enacting similar laws. For example, a Democrat member introduced the "RESTRICT Act (Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats and Risk Information and Communications Technology Act)" in the Senate in March. The bill proposes that the US secretary of commerce be given the power to review business transactions involving certain information and communications technologies, products or services if they are connected to a "foreign adversary" that poses an "undue and unacceptable risk" to the US. A number of legislators have opposed the bill.

If enacted, this bill too is likely to fail on First Amendment grounds.

Montana leads the way in hypocrisy. But that should not come as any surprise. It is a state where you can buy an assault rifle without a background check and carry a concealed weapon without a permit, but in order to protect the public, the state administration bans TikTok.

This happens only in the US.

The author is a senior fellow at the Center for China and Globalization.

The views don't necessarily represent those of China Daily.

If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲成 人a影院青久在线观看 | 国产成人综合一区精品 | 欧美巨大另类极品videohd | 久草在线色站 | 国产精品欧美亚洲韩国日本 | 国产三级中文字幕 | 波多野结衣一区二区 三区 波多野结衣一区二区三区88 | 亚洲情a成黄在线观看动 | 欧美精品一级毛片 | 欧美人在线一区二区三区 | a一级免费| 奶交性视频欧美 | 91欧美一区二区三区综合在线 | 日韩在线资源 | 99久久精品男女性高爱 | 视频一区视频二区在线观看 | 福利一二三区 | 72种姿势欧美久久久久大黄蕉 | 亚洲国产精品久久 | 毛片a级三毛片免费播放 | 99久久www免费 | 日韩一级视频在线观看播放 | 一级白嫩美女毛片免费 | 国产全部理论片线观看 | 日韩欧美国产成人 | 手机在线观看黄色网址 | 特级淫片日本高清视频 | 嫩模大尺度人体福利视频 | 亚洲成a人片在线观看中文!!! | 国产中文字幕在线观看 | 精品国产一区二区三区久久影院 | 日本一区二区三区在线 视频观看免费 | 一级做a爰片久久毛片唾 | 国产欧美日韩在线观看精品 | 国产成人3p视频免费观看 | 亚洲精品国产成人中文 | 欧美成 人h版在线观看 | 中文字幕一区中文亚洲 | 国产免费高清在线精品一区 | 美欧毛片| 国产精品理论片在线观看 |