久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Business / View

Fairness of anti-trust can't be doubted

By Liu Hui (China Daily) Updated: 2014-09-24 07:28

There is nothing wrong with the government - central and local - offering some favorable policies and rules to attract foreign investors in order to boost economic development and introduce more advanced technologies and management expertise to the country. But beyond a certain point, such a practice contravenes the principle of "fair competition". In fact, "excessive use" of such policies by some local governments has widened the competition gap between foreign and domestic companies, with many foreign companies using their superiority over domestic enterprises in terms of funds, technology, management and brands to establish monopolies in the Chinese market.

Besides, taking advantage of their capability to manipulate the market, foreign companies have also abused their monopolistic status. Indeed, China has enacted and implemented a string of market laws and regulations since 1996, but they have a lot of loopholes because of the country's complicated economic and legal situations.

Many foreign companies have used these loopholes to evade China's market laws and indulge in illegal activities such as price fixing, limiting of resale prices and misusing IPR protection, which would have drawn severe penalties even in US and European markets. For example, to bypass China's regulation that forbids the entry of foreign investors into specific industries, some foreign companies and individuals have registered listed entities overseas to control domestic operators that can access these sectors. Of course, a company is branded a monopoly not because of its size or share of the market, but because of the way it uses its position in the market.

Some Western observers have also questioned the fairness of the anti-monopoly probes because no open hearings have been held or clarifications sought from the investigated foreign companies. They have also alleged that the investigated foreign enterprises are barred from hiring lawyers to fight their case or coerced into accepting penalties. If that were indeed the case, why so many foreign companies have been declared free of monopolistic traits after being probed by anti-trust agencies?

It is true that a number of foreign companies have been penalized for monopolistic activities since January 2013, but they account for only 10 percent of all those investigated since China implemented the Anti-Monopoly Law in 2008. The purpose of Chinese authorities is not to target companies based on their ownerships and parent countries, but to regulate the business environment.

The anti-trust probes are aimed at helping China promote mature market operations, abandon preferential policies for foreign companies and allow the market to play a more decisive role in resource distribution by setting up a truly efficient regulatory and sound legal system.

The author is an assistance research fellow with the Institute of American Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲免费三级 | 国产日本一区二区三区 | 久草手机在线观看视频 | 日本视频在线免费观看 | 免费一级特黄欧美大片久久网 | 成人亚洲在线观看 | 亚洲国产一区二区三区四区 | 亚洲国产激情一区二区三区 | 久久青草网站 | 亚洲综合成人网 | 人碰人碰人成人免费视频 | 国产亚洲一区二区三区在线观看 | 天堂av2017男人的天堂 | 国产精品免费观看视频 | 亚洲欧美另类在线视频 | 在线久草| 久久久精品久久久久久久久久久 | 久久久毛片| 成年人视频在线免费看 | 精品视频国产狼人视频 | 99精品高清视频一区二区 | 一级在线观看视频 | 国产在线精品香蕉综合网一区 | 天堂va欧美ⅴa亚洲va一国产 | 免费人成黄页在线观看视频国产 | 成人免费aaaaa毛片 | 欧美久久久久久 | 成人久久视频 | 欧美成人免费tv在线播放 | 欧美透逼视频 | 亚洲精品不卡久久久久久 | 成在线人视频免费视频 | 色噜噜国产精品视频一区二区 | 日本成a人伦片 | 久久最新视频 | 亚洲精品一区二区三区在线看 | 亚洲国产欧洲精品路线久久 | 欧美亚洲国产精品久久高清 | 久久久久久久99久久久毒国产 | 日韩在线视频线视频免费网站 | 国产欧美日韩精品一区二 |