久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

Developing a better pension scheme for our elderly citizens

Updated: 2016-01-06 09:56

By Zhou Bajun(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

When Chris Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong, raised the issue of introducing a universal pension system in Hong Kong shortly before the handover, the move was widely perceived as being politically motivated. It was, therefore, quickly rejected by many people in society. Back then, those born after World War II were in their prime and the problem of the growing aging population was not so serious. With the local economy doing well, the incomes of most employees and their families were still rising. People were much more concerned about the establishment of a citywide mandatory pension fund system than some half-hearted gesture.

Today, however, it is a completely different situation after the SAR government launched the first round of public consultation on improving Hong Kong's retirement pension system last month. Psychologically, people could not be more eager to have some kind of old-age financial assurance in place before retirement. This is because the growing aging population problem persists while the income gap keeps growing. The Mandatory Provident Fund, set up in December 2000, has fallen far behind the rising cost of living for the great majority of retirees.

A "universal" pension system for everybody, regardless of financial means, had already dominated public opinion before the government launched its consultation exercise. This consists of two options for the public to consider. Obviously, the opposition camp will find fault with the details of the government's plan even if it leans toward being a "universal pension". So it is little wonder their reaction to the government's consultation paper has been so uniformly negative - as the opposition favors retirement protection for the "poor" only.

The two competing options are fundamentally different from the beginning. One is for everybody (regardless of financial means) and is undoubtedly oriented toward people's right to a retirement pension. But the other is welfare-oriented and requires a means test to determine whether a person qualifies for it or not. The government told the public it favors the welfare-oriented option before it launched the consultation drive.

Respecting and caring for senior citizens is a Chinese tradition. Mencius (372-289 BC) famously said in one of his teachings that people should treat old people like family. We as a nation also believe people should be cared for when they are old. This is so they do not feel forgotten and feel they can still be useful. Retirement protection is, therefore, a common way for societies to care for their old people.

When discussing material provisions, a pension scheme should not just be limited to "poverty alleviation" for poor senior citizens. The current SAR government, by assigning the universal pension scheme consultation to the Commission on Poverty made a wrong start. It ultimately reduced retirement protection to just another charity fund. I do not think the government can talk itself out of this blunder.

The true intent of a universal pension scheme is to ensure all retirees live with dignity and are cared for. Such care should not differentiate between the "poor" and other people. Society must show respect and gratitude to all those who have contributed to it.

I understand the current SAR government's concerns about the public coffers if a universal pension scheme is adopted. Legitimate as these concerns are, they should not be used as an excuse to dominate the public consultation. Instead, the government should respect the true intent of retirement protection and highlight the compassionate aspect of this. It has to do whatever is necessary so retirees feel they are receiving the help they deserve. This must not be just some gesture of pity for the needy.

Do not forget there are many retirees whose means are not low enough to qualify for the government-favored pension scheme or high enough to live comfortably without it. This "middle group" deserves attention also. The government should add an in-between option to ensure that "well-to-do" retirees are not just left to their own means for the sake of the public coffers. It is a good thing that the government plans to help retirees secure a stable income one way or another. They should just not take too long to reveal their plans.

Developing a better pension scheme for our elderly citizens <BR>

(HK Edition 01/06/2016 page9)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品日本欧美一区二区 | 国产欧美一区二区精品性色 | 毛片免费视频 | 成人在线精品 | 欧美一区精品二区三区 | 成人做爰网站免费看 | 手机看片国产免费永久 | 女人张开腿 让男人桶视频 女人张开腿等男人桶免费视频 | 国产欧美日韩综合精品一区二区 | 亚洲欧美日韩中文字幕在线 | 国产免费高清福利拍拍拍 | 特黄a大片免费视频 | 精品国产日韩亚洲一区在线 | 亚洲人欧洲日韩 | 欧美精品做人一级爱免费 | 久久久久久免费播放一级毛片 | 日韩国产欧美成人一区二区影院 | 久久黄色免费网站 | 国产成视频| 亚洲免费专区 | 亚洲成人黄色在线 | 亚洲精品久久9热 | 亚洲v视频| 国产一级毛片免 | 久久精品国产亚洲片 | 男人天堂视频网站 | 一级特黄a免费大片 | 成年人免费观看的视频 | 日韩欧美国产精品第一页不卡 | 手机看片精品国产福利盒子 | 手机看片1024国产基地 | 午夜在线播放免费人成无 | 2345成人高清毛片 | 国产精品久久久久久久久 | 欧美成人免费网在线观看 | 免费国产一区二区在免费观看 | 她也啪在线视频精品网站 | 久久久久久久91精品免费观看 | 欧美亚洲欧美区 | 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区三区 | 欧美激情性色生活片在线观看 |