久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

Please don't make a political football out of Chinese history

Updated: 2017-11-23 06:00

(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

Tim Collard explains why the teaching of Chinese history is so important, while offering some advice on sensible ways to do this in the SAR

On Nov 14's China Daily Hong Kong Edition, veteran current affairs commentator Lau Nai-keung expressed some deep concerns at the prospect of a forthcoming political battle over the teaching of Chinese history in Hong Kong.

I do not always agree with Mr Lau's views, and for that reason it is a pleasure to acknowledge that he is talking a great deal of sense here. As a historian myself, I fully agree that history, both of one's own nation and culture and of the world in general, deserves a very high place in the educational curriculum. The teaching of history should not be a political battleground, although it is necessary that political debate should be informed by an understanding of history. If I were Chinese, I should be immensely proud of the length of the continuous history of my nation. And of its depth too - a comparison of historical sources from, say, the Tang Dynasty (618-907), to the mere scraps of source material we have in Europe from the same period, makes me deeply envious.

Please don't make a political football out of Chinese history

It is thus very sad that the teaching of history in Hong Kong - one of Asia's greatest educational centers - should be falling victim to squabbles over political issues, such as localism or the "independence" issue. Of course one understands why it is happening - there are fears that the mainland may overreact to "localist" propaganda and enforce a curriculum allowing no dissent from the "official version" of history.

But these fears may be counterproductive. As Mr Lau points out, if the teaching of history in Hong Kong should appear to have been "captured" by dissident teachers, it only increases the chances of a crackdown. The facts of history speak for themselves, and they do not support a view that the mainland and Hong Kong are fundamentally different entities.

However, Hong Kong, quite properly, has a slightly different take on this, as a Chinese entity which was for a time outside the control of central Chinese governments. Hong Kong's role in the modernization of China, from serving as a base camp for Sun Yat-sen, first provisional president of the Republic of China, as he planned his reforms to the failing Qing state, to the fuelling of Deng Xiaoping's reforms in the 1980s, is a historical fact and should be clearly acknowledged. It could be said, in fact, that "one country, two systems" goes back a long way before 1997. Hong Kong has always been Chinese, has undergone a period of separate development from that of the mainland, and is now back under Chinese sovereignty making its own unique contribution to the development of the nation. Surely this is an understanding of history on which both mainland loyalists and Hong Kong localists can agree on?

But the main point on which I agree with Mr Lau is that "weaponizing" history, or using it purely for the purpose of provocation, does no one any good, especially the young people whose educational interests are being betrayed by this approach. I am British. Our history is problematic. That of Japan and Germany is more problematic still. Yes, there are elements in the recent history of China, as with other countries, which will need careful handling. But it will benefit no one if we keep on beating each other over the head with them.

As a foreign ex-diplomat and academic who occasionally lectures to students both in Hong Kong and on the mainland, I have always found people very willing to learn more and to ask intelligent questions (putting many British students to shame, in fact!). But I am also a father, and I know very well that intelligent young people do not respond well to being told what they should think about things. There is plenty of room for historical debate regarding the incredibly multi-faceted history and culture of China, and I always encounter an enormous thirst for knowledge. It would be tragic if the space for discussion were closed off due to ideological trench warfare.

So please don't make Chinese history a political football. It is far too rich and valuable for that.

The author is a sinologist, writer, columnist, lecturer and former British diplomat in Beijing.

(HK Edition 11/23/2017 page8)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲男人a天堂在线2184 | 成人亚洲综合 | 亚洲欧美精选 | 国产亚洲精品久久久久久久久激情 | 亚洲网站一区 | 国产成人久久精品区一区二区 | 日韩看片 | 女性无套免费网站在线看 | 夜夜操夜夜爽 | 免费国产不卡午夜福在线观看 | 免费观看成为人视频 | 久久91av | 亚洲三级中文字幕 | 欧美特黄一级 | 国产老鸭窝毛片一区二区 | 成人午夜免费视频 | 久久久91精品国产一区二区 | 国产一级一片免费播放视频 | 国产欧美日韩亚洲 | caoporen国产91在线| 日韩中文字幕精品一区在线 | 成人黄色免费网站 | 国产亚洲一区二区三区在线 | 亚洲国产99在线精品一区二区 | 久草在线视频免费播放 | 亚洲乱码国产一区网址 | 中国女人真人一级毛片 | 极品美女户外勾搭无套 | 国产成人tv在线观看 | 最新亚洲情黄在线网站无广告 | 日本成aⅴ人片日本伦 | 九九色在线视频 | 欧美在线亚洲国产免m观看 欧美在线一级精品 | 欧美一区二区视频三区 | 看真人一一级毛片 | 亚洲www视频| 国产乱码精品一区二区三区四川人 | 国产精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 精品国产午夜久久久久九九 | 亚洲成人黄色网 | 日韩在线中文字幕 |