久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Lifestyle
Home / Lifestyle / X-Ray

Controversial constructions

By Raymond Zhou | China Daily | Updated: 2012-09-17 09:32

But we need to differentiate between structures whose main purpose is to evoke the objects of designer's intention and those whose space for imagination is squeezed out by a dominant interpretation, often made in jest. The National Stadium did not intend to resemble a bird's nest, nor was the National Center for the Performing Arts meant to boil down its aspirations to the form of an egg. The similarity is more interpretative than intentional.

Another reason for the wave of antagonism toward the Suzhou tower is the absence of public feedback on such high-profile structures.

Related: A love letter to Shanghai

Whether public or private buildings, they tend to reshape the urban skyline, unlike villas that are tucked away from public view. A mechanism for public consultation will create a participatory milieu and proactively diffuse many of the bad feelings that may arise.

However, there is an artistic component to a potential landmark.

And, as such, a referendum on the design will only yield the lowest common denominator.

It is only natural that people are comfortable with architectural designs that are tried and true. In China or overseas, you never see a public protest against blandness and mediocrity. It is the "outrageous" buildings that are the targets of malcontent.

In hindsight, we all see many of these structures eventually become icons of the places where they were erected.

The Sydney Opera House is a well-known case in point. Now, it is the symbol of the city.

The Eiffel Tower was considered "useless and monstrous" in its day, and many of the biggest names in French arts and literature attempted to stop it from being constructed.

Likewise, calls to boycott the "giant egg" in Beijing were loud and clear. But since its 2007 opening, the eggshell of a theater has been wowing both spectators and patrons alike. No doubt it is on a fast track to becoming a new wonder in the ancient capital city's landscape.

If examined closely, "outrageous" buildings usually fall into two categories: extremely good or extremely bad.

They provoke your sensibility. Depending on your aesthetics, you'll either love or hate them.

But even if the majority of the current population demonstrates an aversion to it, by no means does it exclude the possibility that future generation may embrace it - or even exalt it to iconic stature.

China's urban planners are acutely aware of the power of architectural landmarks.

One building, smartly and presciently designed, may spread the reputation and even the spirit of a locale more efficiently than marketing campaigns of a massive scale. Think of Dubai's Burj al Arab and of all the advertising dollars it may have saved the country.

It's safe to say every Chinese city wants its equivalent of the Burj al Arab.

To achieve a higher likeliness of global fame, municipal officials have turned to international firms for designs. Almost all high-profile public projects in recent years, including Suzhou's Gate of the Orient, got their blueprints from big-name Western architects.

That decision may have ruffled some feathers among those who watch out for dubious foreign influences.

Some gripe that China has become a hotbed for architectural adventure. While it is premature to equate the quality of a design with the country where a firm or an architect is based, it leaves little doubt that these foreign conceptualizations tend to be unconventional.

Whether a building is bold and beautiful, or disputed and detestable, the experts may not be a bigger authority than the public - or vice versa. Will familiarity breed more complacency or more contempt? Only time will tell.

One thing is for sure, though: If all public buildings are subject to a citywide vote before getting the green light, few of the iconic structures that grace today's world would have jumped from the drawing board to the horizon.

The same goes for statues, installations, films, plays and operas. If anything, it shows that, when it comes to artistic matters, neither the size nor the education level of a crowd will certainly offer an inkling of what the future holds.

When China was just opening up in the 1980s, there was a fear that future skyscrapers would be built according to the "matchbox" template or with a high degree of uniformity in facade.

The fear was not unfounded. Only a decade earlier, the whole nation was dressed in the same colors - blue and gray - and the same sartorial configurations.

Given the Chinese proclivity for homogeny, we have turned out pretty well. If to err is human, I'd rather we err on the side of audacity.

I'd derive more gratification from a building that is annoying than one that is utterly forgettable.

For more articles by Raymond Zhou, click here

Previous 1 2 Next

Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲视频在线免费看 | 色综合色狠狠天天久久婷婷基地 | 青青爽国产手机在线观看免费 | 国产三级日本三级日产三 | 亚洲精品成人在线 | 精品在线99 | 日韩精品三级 | 久久久久亚洲日日精品 | 国产成人精品女人不卡在线 | 国产精品专区第二 | 久久精品中文字幕不卡一二区 | 亚洲精品久久久久久久777 | 亚洲国产国产综合一区首页 | 国产一区三区二区中文在线 | 久久er国产精品免费观看1 | 日韩精品中文字幕一区二区三区 | 午夜在线成人 | 久久视频一区 | 日韩色网站 | 成人在线91 | 综合 欧美 亚洲日本 | 国产精品九九视频 | 99久久99久久精品免费看子 | 国产主播大尺度精品福利 | 欧美综合成人网 | 日韩精品在线免费观看 | 欧美日韩综合高清一区二区 | 免费一级毛片女人图片 | 国产一级aaa全黄毛片 | 欧美—级v免费大片 | 韩国一级淫片视频免费播放 | 99精品视频在线观看re | 国产中文字幕视频 | 国产精品亚洲一区二区三区在线观看 | 中文字幕亚洲天堂 | 国内真实愉拍系列情侣自拍 | 日本xxxxx黄区免费看动漫 | 毛片免费看网站 | 日韩一级不卡 | 日本人成18在线播放 | 中国内地毛片免费高清 |