久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Opinion Line

Demolition of university building causes dilemma for local officials

(China Daily) Updated: 2016-09-13 07:53

Demolition of university building causes dilemma for local officials

People flock to the cherry blossom garden in Wuhan University on the first day it began selling tickets in Wuhan city, capital of Central China's Hubei province, March 21, 2014. [Photo/icpress.cn]

THE MAIN TEACHING BUILDING OF Wuhan University in Central China's Hubei province was demolished with explosives on Friday. Media reports quoted local officials as saying they demolished the building as it spoiled the scenic surroundings of nearby East Lake. Southern Metropolis Daily commented:

The building, designed by architect He Jingtang, was built in 1997 at the cost of 100 million yuan ($14.9 million) and put into use in 2000. It won several national architecture awards, including the top award for architecture, the Luban Award.

Yet the building was demolished at the cost of 13 million yuan. That's a huge waste of taxpayers' money, because Wuhan University is a public university, funded by the State.

Moreover, the incident is a legal matter. Let's have a look at the nation's Circular Economy Promotion Law, which requires urban governments and the owners of buildings to take measures to maintain them and lengthen their service life. The law also forbids local governments to demolish buildings within their service lives unless it is in the public's interest.

Obviously, demolishing the university building breaks the law. In order to defend themselves, the officials offered the excuse that the building was so high that it exceeded the height limits for buildings around the East Lake. They even said that the building has "ruined the scenery of East Lake".

That's a rather weak excuse and a ridiculous defense. As early as the 1980s, East Lake was listed in the national plan for ecological tourism, and the building was constructed later than that. If the building went against that plan, why did the officials not intervene when they started building it? Why were they silent in 1996 and then have the building demolished 20 years later?

Officials in Wuhan now face a dilemma. If they insist the demolished building had problems, the officials who approved its construction in 1996 should be held answerable. If the building did not break any planning restrictions and there was no justification for the demolition, those who decided to demolish it should pay for their deeds. Something illegal has happened and taxpayers' money has been wasted, and we hope to make clear who is responsible.

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲高清自拍 | 亚洲最大的视频网站 | 久久国产精品夜色 | 日韩aⅴ在线观看 | 国产美女主播一级成人毛片 | 日韩一区二区三区不卡视频 | 亚洲精品成人中文网 | 欧美特黄一片aa大片免费看 | 一区二区三区免费视频 www | 欧洲性大片xxxxx久久久 | 91精品国产手机在线版 | 97国产免费全部免费观看 | 欧美一级高清免费播放 | 久久免费看 | 理论片我不卡在线观看 | 国产高清一国产免费软件 | 亚洲欧美日韩精品久久亚洲区 | 99免费在线播放99久久免费 | 久久久久久国产精品三级 | 视频精品一区 | 亚洲精品理论 | 亚洲性久久久影院 | 韩国在线精品福利视频在线观看 | 午夜主播福利视频在线观看 | 国产一区二区影视 | 久久ri精品高清一区二区三区 | 免费看男女做好爽好硬视频 | 国产理伦 | 老外黑人欧美一级毛片 | 日本韩国三级在线观看 | 亚洲 欧美 日韩 丝袜 另类 | 日本成年人视频网站 | 免费观看一级成人毛片 | 国产精品亚洲欧美日韩区 | 欧美综合在线视频 | 日本韩国欧美一区 | 一级欧美激情毛片 | 国产综合久久久久影院 | 欧美les视频xxxx在线观看 | a级毛片免费播放 | 午夜神马视频 |